Large Company Sales Tips for Founders

Steve Blank has one message for startup founders - Get out of the building

So what happens when founders go out of the building and have to do sales with no previous experience? This is what happened to me. I had no experience of how large companies work.

Here are a few lessons I picked up from my experience of selling to large companies.

1. Network - There is only one way to break into large companies independently, that is via your contacts and network. Go back to your alumni association, your family, your school and college buddies. Start working on your networking skills. Networking is all about first finding a common interest (say Open Source or you went to the same school) with someone and then getting to personally know them - their family, interests, goals etc.

2. Find the right audience - If you are selling a business product, find business users who may benefit from the solution, if you are selling a technical product, go to the technical users. If you are not sure, go to the business users - they are likely to find a use for your product.

3. Be patient and consistent - Large companies are usually bureaucratic and paranoid about startups. But even within large enterprises there are early adopters. Once you get someone interested in your service, keep them in the loop. Remember if someone takes interest in you, they will give you a pilot or refer you to someone

4. Dress and present well - Large companies are used to smart (power) dressing and glitzy presentations. Make a good presentation, polish your shoes, wear neat formal clothes and talk confidently and clearly. Be prepared to flash a knowing smile as often as you can. Everyone likes people who look and behave like them. So try and mirror your contact.

5. Blend in the culture of the company - This may be difficult if you are not too experienced, but try and look for signs. Are your prospects specific or vague? Do they act important or humble? Are they paranoid or risk-taking? Are they formal or casual? Tailor your pitch accordingly and try to fit into their culture.

6. Communicate and be serious about commitments - Once your foot is in the door, keep your contact in loop. Startups usually fail to grasp or estimate the true costs of executing a project. So it is best to under-promise and over-deliver. If you think you are going to run over deadlines, keep communicating. By communicating, you will get valuable feedback about how your project / pilot is progressing and if you need to make any changes to your solution or approach.

If all this is not for you, then you do not have the temperament to do large company sales... like me :-) All of this is usually time consuming and expensive. This is why enterprise products are so expensive!

Finding the ideal team structure for Startups

A lot of what is written about managing teams is a discussion of the two basic classes of teams, centralized and decentralized teams. Both have their pros and cons and are best suited to different situations.

Centralized teams also give rise to a top-down structure of an organization. Top down teams can get a lot of work done as all members work in tandem. Independent and creative thinking can jeopardize the entire organization. The scope of work is divided into two classes, thinkers and doers. Thinkers do medium/long range planning, anticipate issues, allocate resources, manage motivation and doers execute the activities that the thinkers have identified on a transaction basis. Centralized teams are usually stable and provide security to all its members. Large companies and governments usually fall into this category.

De-centralized teams on the other hand are much more fluid and depend on creative and independent thinking members. These teams are usually upstarts and their objective is to find a niche that has not been exploited by others. Every member is a thinker and doer. The tasks are not stable and the position of each member is not secure if they are not willing to change their roles or learn new skills.

Truly decentralized teams are a much more rear phenomenon in business than centralized teams. Hence most people would have never experienced working in decentralized teams or even heard of anyone who worked in one. This also includes founders of start-up companies

A one to three person start-up does not face this problem, but when a start-up takes more risk than usual, the centralization / decentralization problem comes up. This is because most people have no experience / understanding of de-centralized way of working. As Steve Blank rightly points out, a start-up is a "search" for a scalable business model and hence what it requires is a de-centralized team. This is exactly what Jason Fried and company write about in "Rework"

Or the other option is to become ambidextrous. Be centralized and de-centralized at the same time. Let the need drive the structure. Say if you need to do extensive testing before a new feature release, make a centralized team and split planning and doing. If you need to build 10 new features in a month, keep it de-centralized. The catch here is that all the team members also have to be ambidextrous.

SAP lauches ByDesign

This month saw the release of SAP's online ERP - SAP ByDesign. Going by the great brand it has and all the German zest for engineering, it seems to be pretty good. I did see some of the videos online about the product. Now in India they seem to be going at Rs 3000 - 5000 per user per month depending on the number of modules you select.

Again brings me to the question. Similar products by startups like us - iWebNotes.com give most of the features at a fraction of the price. Dozens of other startups also have similar products that give many of the products at the same price. So where is all of this heading to? We know SAP cannot have the cost structure to give a a lower price.

Comments welcome!